The Systematic Reclassification and Planning Restrictions of Silwan

Memorandum

The Systematic Reclassification and Planning Restrictions of Silwan

How reclassification, renaming and restrictive zoning have been used to partition a Palestinian neighbourhood in East Jerusalem


This memorandum analyses the administrative and planning mechanisms used by the Jerusalem Municipality and Israeli state ministries to fundamentally alter the identity and physical boundaries of the Silwan neighbourhood. Through a strategic combination of statistical reclassification, nomenclature shifts, and restrictive zoning — specifically Plans AM/9 and AM/6 — the area has been segmented. This division is designed to facilitate the expansion of the “City of David” archaeological and settler site at the direct expense of the historical Palestinian urban fabric.

51%Of its original area still named Silwan on municipal maps
2022Year the statistical area was split in two
AM/9 + AM/6Overlapping plans freezing Palestinian construction

Historical context and geographic integrity

Following the Six-Day War of 1967 and the Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, the Jerusalem Municipality initially adopted the boundaries of Silwan as inherited from the Jordanian era. These encompassed the traditional built-up area stretching from the western borders of Jabal al-Mukabber toward the north, including the Al-Rahma Cemetery along the Old City’s eastern walls (see Maps 1 and 2).

  1. Statistical recognition. Historically, the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) designated this entire area as a single, unified statistical area. This designation acknowledged Silwan as a cohesive Palestinian entity for demographic tracking and socio-economic planning (see Map 4).
  2. Independent corroboration. Research by the Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research confirms that the core built-up residential area — including the western sector and Baten al-Hawa — was universally recognised as a contiguous Palestinian urban fabric by planners and researchers until the recent administrative intervention.
  3. Integrity of the built environment. These research-based maps demonstrate that despite minor technical variations in perimeters, the residential core has remained functionally identical, contradicting the current official narrative of two separate neighbourhoods.

The mechanics of administrative partitioning

In recent years, a multi-agency operation has sought to codify a “new reality” on paper to facilitate expansion on the ground. This is achieved through three specific mapping and naming shifts:

  1. Municipal re-mapping. The Jerusalem Municipality now publishes maps on its official website that split the built-up fabric into two distinct sections: “Silwan” and the “City of David.” The area retaining the name Silwan has been reduced to approximately 51% of its original size (see Map 3).
  2. The 2022 statistical split. In 2022, the CBS formally partitioned the original unified statistical zone into two separate zones. This ensures that future data collection and resource allocation can be applied selectively to one side of the line (see Map 5).
  3. Boundary shrinkage and annexation. The northern tip of Silwan, containing the historic Al-Rahma Cemetery, has been administratively severed and attached to the Mount of Olives district. This isolates the neighbourhood from its traditional connection to the Old City walls and the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound.

Schematic of the CBS statistical split, not to scale. See Maps 4 and 5.

Regulatory freezing: Plans AM/9 and AM/6

While mapping shifts erase the neighbourhood’s identity, the physical presence of Palestinian residents is frozen through a “dual-layer” regulatory framework.

Plan AM/9 (Old City Surroundings)

This plan covers the Old City and its immediate environs, specifically targeting the Wadi Hilweh and Sambuski Cemetery areas. By designating inhabited Palestinian land as an “Open Public Area” or “Green Space,” residential construction is strictly prohibited (see Map 6).

Under AM/9, existing homeowners are legally barred from renovating, expanding, or building new structures to meet natural population growth. Any minor alteration is labelled “illegal,” providing a permanent legal pretext for demolition orders.

Plan AM/6 (National Park Designation)

This plan complements AM/9 by officially designating these “open spaces” as National Parks. This shifts management from civil municipal planning to the Israel Nature and Parks Authority (INPA), imposing even more rigid restrictions (see Map 7).

In a highly unusual move, the INPA has delegated the daily management of these public lands to the Elad Foundation (Ir David Foundation) — allowing a private settler organisation with an explicit ideological agenda to manage archaeology and tourism within a densely populated Palestinian neighbourhood.

Legal and humanitarian implications: the “planning trap”

The convergence of these policies creates a systematic legal trap for the residents of Silwan:

  1. The impossibility of permits. Because the land is zoned as a “National Park,” the municipality refuses to issue building permits to Palestinian residents, rendering legal growth impossible.
  2. Forced informality and demolition. Residents are forced to build without permits to accommodate their needs. Authorities then use the Kaminitz Law (an amendment to the Planning and Building Law) to swiftly carry out demolitions, citing “illegal construction” in a protected park.
  3. Forced seizure. Simultaneously, the Absentees’ Property Law is used to transfer Palestinian homes to settler organisations. These organisations are often granted “special permits” for tourism infrastructure or residential units that are categorically denied to the local population.
Conclusion: geographic fragmentation as policy

The treatment of Silwan represents a multi-layered policy of Judaisation through planning. By manipulating statistical boundaries, renaming historical sites, and applying restrictive “green” zoning, the authorities have effectively fragmented the neighbourhood.

This process prioritises archaeological and ideological expansion over the basic human and civil rights of the local population to live and remain in their ancestral homes.

By framing displacement as “environmental preservation” or “archaeological protection,” the state has created a legal environment where the erasure of Palestinian identity is presented as a neutral planning necessity.

Appendix: the maps

The mapping and planning evidence cited above. Together, these maps illustrate the transition from a unified neighbourhood to a fragmented administrative zone controlled by restrictive zoning and settler-managed national parks.

Historical and independent baselines

The following two maps, from the Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research, establish the traditional, internationally and academically recognised boundaries of Silwan prior to the recent administrative interventions. Despite minor technical variations, they confirm that the core built-up residential area — including the area now rebranded as the “City of David” — was historically recognised as a single Palestinian entity, encompassing the eastern sector bordering Jabal al-Mukabber, the western sector (Wadi Hilweh / Baten al-Hawa), and the Al-Rahma Cemetery along the Old City’s eastern walls.

Map with Hebrew labels showing Silwan as a single solid-red area between the Old City and Ras al-Amud, with surrounding neighbourhoods hatched.
Map 1: Silwan — historical/traditional boundaries.Source: Ahmad Asmar, The Arab Neighborhoods in East Jerusalem: Silwan – Infrastructure Research and Evaluation, Research No. 528, Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research, 2020.
Aerial map showing Silwan's historical built-up area shaded south of the Old City and Al-Haram, between Abu Tor and Ras al-Amud, with the Green Line, Separation Wall and neighbourhood boundaries marked.
Map 2: Silwan — historical built-up area (Al-Rahma Cemetery excluded).Source: Ahmad Asmar, The Arab Neighborhoods in East Jerusalem: Silwan – Infrastructure Research and Evaluation, Research No. 528, Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research, 2020.

The mechanics of partition: official state mapping

The following maps from the Jerusalem Municipality and the Central Bureau of Statistics document the formal reclassification of the area.

The municipal neighbourhood map. Currently published on the Jerusalem Municipality’s website, this map formally divides the inhabited fabric of historical Silwan into two sections: “Silwan” and the “City of David.” It is the primary tool used to treat these contiguous residential areas as separate legal and urban entities.

Aerial map of the Old City and surrounding neighbourhoods with Hebrew labels, in which 'City of David' and 'Silwan' appear as two separate neighbourhoods.
Map 3: Old City and surrounding neighbourhoods.Source: Jerusalem Municipality, official website.

The 2022 statistical partition. Historically, the CBS used a single, unified statistical area for all of Silwan. In 2022, this was formally split into two zones: one matching the “reduced” Silwan and the other matching the “City of David” boundaries. This “statistical engineering” allows for the selective reporting of demographic data.

Aerial map with red statistical-area boundaries, showing statistical area 2611 covering the whole of traditional Silwan south of the Old City.
Map 4: Statistical Area #2611, encompassing the complete traditional boundaries of Silwan.
The same aerial area with red boundaries showing former statistical area 2611 divided into separate sub-areas.
Map 5: Breakdown of Statistical Area #2611 into sub-areas #1414 and #1415 (Silwan) and #1411 (City of David).

Regulatory freezing and national park zoning

The following two maps represent the legal and planning trap, in which residential land is designated as public green or open space to prevent Palestinian development.

Plan AM/9 (The Old City Surroundings). This plan follows the new municipal division of Silwan, and designates the western part of Silwan and the area near the Old City walls as an “Open Public Area.” This zoning effectively freezes all Palestinian construction, as any renovation or expansion is labelled “illegal,” leading to demolition orders.

Land-use map of the Old City and surroundings under Plan AM/9, with large areas south and east of the Old City, including western Silwan, coloured green as open public space.
Map 6: Jerusalem Old City and surroundings — land-use designations according to Plan AM/9.

Plan AM/6 (Jerusalem Walls National Park). This plan overlays AM/9, officially designating the same residential areas as a National Park. It shifts land management to the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, which has delegated daily control to the Elad Foundation — a private settler organisation.

Aerial map with a green overlay marking the AM/6 National Park wrapping around the Old City walls and extending south over part of Silwan.
Map 7: National Park designation of the surroundings of Jerusalem’s Old City walls (Plan AM/6).
About this memorandum

Published in March 2026 by the Arab Center for Alternative Planning — ac-ap.org.

Download the full memorandum (PDF)

Scroll to Top